Group 1 Case Studies

Scenario 1-

            Notice- In order to give notice to the public and inform them of facial recognition use, we would place signs around arena and also online when purchasing the ticket. When people purchase their ticket, as well as walk around the stadium, they will be informed of facial recognition features.  In depth information would be online.

            Consent- Those who come into the stadium or purchase tickets would imply consent.  Because it is such a public event, there would be no expectation of privacy.

            Policies-  We decided that  our footage would not be used for any reason other than security.  We would not sell the footage to ad companies or use it to pinpoint people at the game unless there was acceptable reason.  The footage would be kept in a safe database that is only accessible to security personnel for a month after the game and then it would be deleted.

Scenario 2- 

            Questions and Concerns- Intrusive because of social media use.  What are the benefits of connecting to social media? How accurate is the software and how does it prevent false positives?  What company is holding this information and who has access to it? Is consent given at kiosk or when you sign up for frequent shoppers? A very large invasion of privacy for such a little gain.

            Policy- Individuals information should not be stored, but can be put in bulk categories.  Give the shoppers a way to opt out of certain pieces of the program.  Other data brokers can only have access to the bulk information not individuals.